News

IAMSE Fall 2022 Session 4 Highlights

[The following notes were generated by Michele Haight, PhD.]

Presenter: Caroline Harada MD, Associate Professor Internal Medicine, Leader of Geriatrics Consult Service and Assistant Dean for Community Engaged Scholarship at the Heersink School of Medicine at the University of Alabama at Birmingham

Lauren Parker MA, Director of Programs at the University of Kansas School of Medicine

Learning Communities: Creating Structures for Peer Support
The Learning Communities Institute is an organization of health professions schools that has the mission of building connections in medical education and serves as a valuable resource for developing learning community programs within health professions schools.

Framing Student Success
Elucidate the connections between learning communities and student success.
Acknowledge that setbacks are normal and work on the growth and development of students.
Student progress is a collaboration among many faculty in many departments. This shared effort is based on the following principles:

  • Flexibility
  • Inclusivity
  • Interconnectivity
  • Collaboration

These principles are critical operational processes necessary for achievement, implementation and desired outcomes.

Institutional commitment is a shared vision by all stakeholders in the university who are responsible for student success as measured through implementation and impact, and the ability for continued growth and development. These values are representative of the institutional culture.

Learning Communities 101
A learning community is an intentionally developed longitudinal group that aims to enhance students’ medical school experience and maximize learning. The goal is to foster among students a higher level of engagement and intellectual interaction with peers, faculty and the curriculum.

Increasing student engagement facilitates retention and success.
Learning communities came about because of learning development theory which seeks to understand students’ moral identity, their process of developing identity and dealing with challenges and getting support through those challenges.

Learning communities are well established in higher education, but relatively new to medical education.

Functional Areas in Learning Communities for Peer Support

  • Student Support Systems
  • Small Group Curriculum Delivery
  • Professional Identity Formation

There are many different ways to structure a learning community. The structure of a learning community varies widely as each is tailored to the individual institution. Learners are generally assigned to their learning communities at the very beginning of medical school. Typically, students remain in these same learning communities for all four years.

Benefits of learning communities include the following:

  • Better clinical skills
  • Increased student satisfaction with advising systems and wellness programming
  • Improved student interpersonal relationships
  • Greater student connectedness to faculty in small group learning
  • Enhanced faculty satisfaction

Learning Communities as Peer Support

Encourage community building as an investment in the future.

  • Students with strong support networks enable faculty to identify students with difficulty earlier
  • and provide earlier interventions.
  • A support system prevents students from getting into difficulty because they are happier and
  • well supported through strong relationships.
  • Assigned space is useful for community building.

Peer advising/coaching/mentoring/tutoring

  • Mitigate feelings of inadequacy, anxiety, and social isolation.
  • Provide opportunities for near peer support.
  • Structure activities into the academic calendar.
  • Learning community leadership undergoes mandatory training.
  • Leadership group meets monthly .

Programming to support group development

  • Build connections, collegiality and respect at orientation to establish the culture of the
  • learning environment.
  • Engage in activities that cultivate an awareness and collective value for inclusion and belonging
  • and an appreciation for differences within the context of student success.

Resources

  • Institute for Inclusive Teaching at the University of Michigan social and personal identity exercises
  • StoryCorps civil discourse conversation guide

Janet Coffman to Present “Breaking Barriers for Racial/Ethnic Groups”

Medical educators are often called upon to help identify, support, and remediate struggling students. The root causes of student performance deficits are multifaceted and may be due to academic and non-academic factors. Deficiencies are rarely correctable through a simple solution. The Fall 2022 IAMSE Webinar Series will address strategies for identifying and supporting at-risk students and recognizing and breaking down barriers that may limit student success. The fifth and final session in the series will feature Janet Coffman from the University of California, San Francisco (USA).

Janet Coffman, PhD

Breaking Barriers for Racial/Ethnic Groups
Underrepresented in the Health Professions

Presenter: Janet Coffman, PhD
Session Date & Time: September 29, 2022 at 12pm Eastern
Session Description: Underrepresentation of Black, Indigenous, and people of color (BIPOC) in the health professions limits the U.S. health care system’s ability to meet the needs of people in these racial/ethnic groups. A growing body of research shows that patient-physician concordance of race, language, and social characteristics strengthen the patient-physician relationship through higher levels of trust and satisfaction. This webinar will describe the barriers that BIPOC persons face in pursuing health professions education, present a framework for conceptualizing strategies for improving recruitment, retention, and academic success among BIPOC health professions trainees, and describe examples of these strategies. The presentation will focus primarily on examples from medicine and the basic sciences. 

As always, IAMSE Student Members can
register for the series for FREE!

To learn more about student registration, email us at support@iamse.org.

Register Now for the IAMSE 2022 Virtual Forum!

The International Association of Medical Science Educators (IAMSE) is happy to announce that registration for our inaugural Virtual Forum is now open! Join us December 2-3 and 5-6 as we host workshops, ignite talks, posters, lightning talks, roundtable discussions and more. The theme for the Virtual Forum is: 

Health Professions
Education Without Borders

Our world is rapidly changing and the need for future health care professionals to understand this changing landscape is crucial. Join us for the 2022 IAMSE Virtual Forum where we will tear down the borders that separate us and work towards more integrated education opportunities. Borders come in all forms, from geo-political to socio-economic, from online to face to face, and from diversity to experience levels. This forum will feature conversations that showcase the borders but give actional suggestions on how to remove them and build community. Topics include but are not limited to technology-enhanced education, online vs face to face, conflict zone education, diversity equity and inclusion, intercollegiate collaboration, international collaboration, junior and senior educator collaboration, and any other border that hinder us from sharing resources, talents, and helping our students be the best health professional they can be.

Additional details and registration can be found at www.IAMSEForum.org. Looking forward to meeting you at the forum!

IAMSE Fall 2022 Session 3 Highlights

[The following notes were generated by Michele Haight, PhD.]

Presenter: Michael Redinger, MD, MA, Co-Chair Department of Medical Ethics, Humanities, and Law, Interim Chair, Department of Psychiatry, Associate Professor Psychiatry, Western Michigan University, Homer Stryker MD School of Medicine

Mental Health and the Struggling Learner

The goal of this presentation is to assist educators in understanding how mental health difficulties can interfere with student success, both academically and professionally, and provide strategies for preventing and remediating failures attributed to mental illness.

The challenging issue is how to work through when a learner has been identified as having a mental health issue and is struggling either academically or professionally in the curriculum.

Recognizing Mental Illness in the Struggling Learner

  • As a population, physicians and medical students are under increasing stress that has been exacerbated by COVID, and they are experiencing high levels of occupational burnout, depression, and anxiety.
  • Physicians and medical students are also poor at self-care, seeking assistance for themselves or colleagues, and assuming the patient role.
  • Students who have had significant exposure to adverse childhood experiences (ACE) are significantly more likely to report a moderate to significant effect on their mental health compared to their peers.
  • Students who come from other disadvantaged circumstances are more likely to experience ACE and might require more support.
  • A significant number of medical students compared to other graduate level students develop mental health issues over the course of their training. This indicates that there is something about medical school training that predisposes students to some type of mental health issues.
  • External stressors and not patient interactions are the primary drivers of medical school stress.
  • There are observable signs and behaviors that might signal the onset of the conditions described in the DSM-5. Mood and anxiety disorders are the most common conditions in medical school. Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders are not uncommon in medical school.

Psychiatric Fitness-for-Duty (FFD): Ascertaining if someone is in a position to do the job with reasonable skill and safety, which might otherwise be impaired by illness or injury.

  • Impairment: The inability to practice medicine with reasonable skill and safety as a result of illness or injury.
  • Psychiatric illness includes substance use disorders (SUD).
  • Consultation is often triggered by inappropriate or problematic behavior BUT these behaviors do not always result from disability or impairment from psychiatric illness.

Fundamental Questions:

  • Does a psychiatric illness exist?
  • If so, does that illness impair specific functions?
  • To what degree do impaired functions impact job performance?
    (All three of the above need to be present before one is considered impaired.)
    Can functional impairment be mitigated to allow for successful job performance, and, if so, how?

Physicians as a population are not identical to the general population in terms of their cognitive abilities.

  • Measures of the intellectual performance of medical students and physicians on standardized tests of intelligence historically have found that intellectual performance is approximately one to two standard deviations above the mean of the general public.
  • 7%-10% of practicing physicians may be classified as impaired, and 16% may be classified as underperforming.
  • Data on the impact of test-taking anxiety is weak, regardless of the assessment tool.
  • Data regarding the impact of mental illness on academic performance is more robust for college and high school students, not medical students.
  • In one study, physicians who were referred for competency (fitness-for-duty) evaluations scored lower than their colleagues, but not necessarily different than the general population.

Medical student cognitive norms are different than the general population.

  • Medical students who are impaired may be functioning at the mean of a population-wide sample, but are impaired compared to physicians as a whole.
  • Medical students don’t have to necessarily score at a level that is worse than the general population to be considered impaired when compared to their colleagues. This is an important consideration when thinking about accommodations and/or sending a student for cognitive assessments.

Mental Illness and Academic Performance

  • There is insufficient, low-quality data to draw strong conclusions regarding the degree of impact specific mental illnesses have on medical student academic performance.
  • We can infer from other populations that mental illness is likely to impact medical student academic performance for at least some students. The degree of impact remains an open question.

Mental Illness and Professionalism Impairment

  • Most FFD evaluations are triggered by problematic behavior that occurs across specialties and demographics.
  • The seeds of these behaviors are seen early in the course of one’s medical career.
  • Personality disorders are significant contributors to maladaptive behaviors, but are much more difficult to diagnose.
  • Studies suggest correlations between prior grades and test scores and professionalism scores and future disciplinary actions. (Cuddy et al. 2017, Papadakis et al., 2004, 2008) This is an indication that there might be the potential to intervene early.
  • Research also suggests that students with flourishing mental health are less likely to commit even minor professional lapses.

At what point should a physician training program remove students or residents?

  • Medical schools graduate 97% of matriculated students.
  • Unprofessional behavior during medical school was associated with a threefold increase in subsequent disciplinary action by a medical board (Papadakis, 2005).
  • Can we do something about this? Or should we be more judicious about those who we pass through the curriculum?

An Approach to Professionalism Remediation

  • Responses to professionalism lapses need to be holistic and include mental health evaluations.
  • Remediation goes beyond a mandated mental health evaluation.
  • Consider what further efforts can be made to help students access these support and reverse this process?
  • Appraise to what degree different services are mandated or enforced prior to having students return to the curriculum.
  • Look at professionalism through a “just” culture, systems lens when considering remediation or discipline.
  • Consider how we can reverse this.

In Summary:

  • Mental health is a positive contributor to professionalism lapses and later misconduct.
  • Treatment of SUD seems to be the mental illness most amenable to remediation.
  • Depression and burnout are worth addressing. This may help with addressing and minimizing academic difficulties.
  • Behavior change is hard, particularly for those with certain personality traits/disorders.
  • Determining correlation versus causation is difficult in individual cases.
  • No one knows how to do this really well.

Harada and Parker to Present “Learning Communities: Creating Structures for Peer Support”

Medical educators are often called upon to help identify, support, and remediate struggling students. The root causes of student performance deficits are multifaceted and may be due to academic and non-academic factors. Deficiencies are rarely correctable through a simple solution. The Fall 2022 IAMSE Webinar Series will address strategies for identifying and supporting at-risk students and recognizing and breaking down barriers that may limit student success. The fourth session in the series will feature Caroline Harada from the University of Alabama Birmingham (USA) and Lauren Parker from the University of Kansas School of Medicine (USA).

Learning Communities:
Creating Structures for Peer Support

Presenter: Caroline Harada, MD and Lauren Parker, MA
Session Date & Time: September 22, 2022 at 12pm Eastern
Session Description: This webinar will describe how Learning Communities can be used to support struggling students. Learning Communities are intentionally formed groups of students and faculty who actively learn from each other while building relationships that enhance support networks. LC programs can assist struggling students in a multitude of ways and can be easily integrated with other student support structures in a medical school. It will be described how this is done at a variety of institutions across the country.

As always, IAMSE Student Members can
register for the series for FREE!

To learn more about student registration, email us at support@iamse.org.

A Medical Science Educator Article Review From Dr. Anna Blenda

This month the IAMSE publications committee review is taken from the article titled â€˜Precision Cancer Medicine: Dynamic Learning of Cancer Biology in a Clinically Meaningful Context’ (02 April 2021) by Catherine Zivanov, Xuanyi Li, Kaustav P. Shah, Lourdes Estrada, William B. Cutrer, Mary Hooks, Vicki Keedy, Kimberly Brown Dahlman. 

The lack of national guidelines and absence of a comprehensive curriculum for undergraduate oncology education in the US, as well as rapidly developing fields of cancer research and personalized cancer medicine, were the driving forces for the development of the Clinical Cancer Medicine Integrated Science Course (ISC) for medical students at the Vanderbilt University School of Medicine (VUSM). This specialized course is one of 16 ISC courses offered during the Immersion Phase (post-clerkship, years 3-4) at VUSM. The main goal of the ISCs is the reinforcement and integration of the basic science into the clinical context. 

The authors describe the organization and various components of the Clinical Cancer Medicine ISC, including specific topics for active and personalized learning, the online platform for course organization, Meet the Expert seminars, case-based learning (CBL), and team-based learning (TBL) activities. Importantly, they included clinical integration components such as patient care experiences, patient interactions, tumor board meetings, and clinical expert assays. 

Of special value are the self-directed course elements, which provided the learners with a tailored approach to achieve their personal course goals considering their residency interests. The personal learning goals were taken into consideration by module directors at the very beginning of the course, which allowed the provision of specific additional resources based on students’ individual needs. Other self-directed course elements were online learning modules, a Burning Question presentation, ‘MythBusters” challenge, as well as an emphasis on primary literature reading and interpretation. In addition, comprehensive competency-based and quantitative assessments of the Clinical Cancer Medicine ISC have been presented and can be easily adopted for similar courses at other medical schools.  

Based on the students’ feedback, including their level of interest and satisfaction, the Clinical Cancer Medicine ISC is a successful example of integrating precision medicine with cancer biology into post-clerkship undergraduate medical education. 

Anna V. Blenda, PhD
Associate Professor 
Department of Biomedical Sciences
University of South Carolina School of Medicine Greenville
Prisma Health Cancer Institute
Chair, International Association of Medical Science Educators (IAMSE) Publications

Join us for the IAMSE 2023 Medical Education Fellowship Program!

The International Association of Medical Science Educators (IAMSE) is pleased to announce that applications for the 2023 Medical Educator Fellowship (MEF) Program are now being accepted! IAMSE is once again offering members and non-members the option of completing the MEF Program 100% virtually, from any location around the globe.

The primary goal of the MEF is to support the development of well-rounded healthcare education scholars through a program of targeted professional development and application of learned concepts to mentored research projects. The program is designed for healthcare educators from all backgrounds who wish to enhance their knowledge and productivity as educational scholars.

Please note that as a prerequisite, applicants are required to have completed the Essential Skills in Medical Education (ESME) Program. For more detailed information about the program, please visit the information on our website at http://www.iamse.org/fellowship-program/.

Applicants for the next cohort will be accepted until December 1, 2022. You can submit your application with the button below. In case your application is accepted, you will be invited to an online kickoff meeting on December 15, 2022. For questions about the Fellowship or how to apply, please contact support@iamse.org. We thank you for your interest and look forward to supporting you in achieving your professional goals in educational scholarship.

IAMSE Fall 2022 Session 2 Highlights

[The following notes were generated by Michele Haight, PhD.]

Presenter: Jason Walker, PhD, Assistant Dean of Transformational Learning, Associate Professor Physiology, Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine South Georgia

The Off-Cycle Curriculum: Intention vs. Impact

Even though curricular change is a constant in undergraduate medical education (UME), the structure of medical education has not substantially evolved since the Flexner Report of 1910.

The 2020 Pandemic served as a catalyst for both chaos and change in UME.

Lessons Learned:

Increased interest in medical school

Increased and creative use of hybrid learning

Learning medicine takes a community (Learners felt isolated)

Struggling learners were allowed to progress (Implemented supports to advance struggling learners)

We are rebuilding our learners after the pandemic.  In this process, we need to continuously ask ourselves if we are building students on sand or on bedrock.

What is a decelerated curriculum?

  • Deceleration is an alternative distribution of the preclinical courses that allows student to complete the first and second year curricula in three years.
  • Deceleration may allow students to decompress their curriculum or repeat a course or courses in which they have deficiencies.
  • Deceleration: Mandatory vs. Voluntary (based upon student, environment, and institution)

Considerations when placing a student on academic suspension:

  • What happens when a student is placed on academic suspension?
  • What resources does a student have access to while on an academic suspension that are provided by the institution?
  • What expectations are placed on a student when they return from academic suspension? What are the expectations and accountability faculty, administrators, the institution?
  • Are there any programs in place to track or check in with a student while on academic suspension? We must remember that the student has “failed” and is deeply feeling that sense of failure.
  • What is the financial impact on the student who is placed on academic suspension?

Creating an Off-Cycle Program: To provide engagement to separated students to keep them connected to the institution.

Student Needs

  1. Academic structure
  2. Improvement of Knowledge Base
  3. Improved Study Habits
  4. Confidence Rebuilding

Implementation

  1. ScholarRx (short bites of information)
  2. Creation of Modules (post Module 30-40 item quiz)
  3. Creation of a Book Club (all campuses; Make it Stick)
  4. Bi-weekly small group advising with faculty
  5. Monthly “authentic” small group sessions

As faculty, we need to consistently address the question of “Why am I here?” for our students in order to help them better understand how to create individual change from the inside out.

Small group interactions resulted in the creation of a strong support group for all of the off-cycle learners.

When the assessment supports that were implemented during the pandemic were removed, a new group of struggling students was identified. This prompted the following:

  • Creation of an Off-Cycle Curriculum Council (OCC) to recommend candidates for the Off-Cycle curriculum.
  • Provision of counseling for the candidates and review of the Off-Cycle curricular requirements: withdraw from basic science courses, stay enrolled in small credit courses to keep financial aid, fully audit all M1 courses, and engage in all labs.
  • Clarification that the student makes the final decision to participate in the Off-Cycle curriculum and must agree to sign a contract.

Off-Cycle Accountability

  • Off-cycle curriculum plan will be maintained in the permanent program record.
  • Off-cycle students will be evaluated each term within the off-cycle curriculum plan.
  • Off-cycle students must achieve an assessment average of 75% during each M1 term they are recapturing.
  • Off-cycle students who fail to meet academic or professional standard while decelerated may be dismissed from the program.

Limitations of the Off-Cycle Curriculum:

  • Lack of student motivation to extend medical school.
  • Insufficient data on Off-Cycle student progress and outcomes.
  • Lack of reliable and valid procedures for student outcomes and readiness prior to leaving the Off-Cycle curriculum.

Diagnosis of Deficiency

We make assumptions based on: MCAT scores, race/ethnicity, previous academic history, time management, study plan. We make decisions based on what we think we know.

Truth will determine the Real Impact: family issues, undiagnosed medical issues, undiagnosed disabilities, trauma, Nobody Ever Asked!!!!

Process for determining academic deficiency:

Deficiency in Assessments>Development of Remediation Strategy>Remediation with deliberate repetition, feedback and reflection>Reassessments>Reintegration into Regular Curriculum

OR

>Integration into the Off-Cycle Curriculum>Diagnosis of Deficiency

Considerations for creating a 5-year curriculum:

Identify at risk matriculants prior to first day of the first year of medical school based on the following:

  • Learners’ discretion at understanding how they learn
  • Socioeconomic status
  • Mental Health concerns
  • Non-Traditional Students

Potential external challenges: Accreditors, Institutional finances, Space accommodation

It is time to re-imagine remediation as Restructure, Integrated, Supplemental Education or RISE.

Michael Redinger to Present “Mental Health and the Struggling Learner”

Medical educators are often called upon to help identify, support, and remediate struggling students. The root causes of student performance deficits are multifaceted and may be due to academic and non-academic factors. Deficiencies are rarely correctable through a simple solution. The Fall 2022 IAMSE Webinar Series will address strategies for identifying and supporting at-risk students and recognizing and breaking down barriers that may limit student success. The third session in the series will feature Michael Redinger from the Western Michigan University Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine (USA).

Michael Redinger, MD, MA

Mental Health and the Struggling Learner

Presenter: Michael Redinger, MD, MA
Session Date & Time: September 15, 2022 at 12pm Eastern
Session Description: This session will assist educators in understanding how mental health difficulties can interfere with student success, both academically and professionally, and provide strategies for preventing and remediating failures attributed to mental illness.

As always, IAMSE Student Members can
register for the series for FREE!

To learn more about student registration, email us at support@iamse.org.

Reminder* IAMSE Manual Proposals Due October 15

The IAMSE Manuals Editorial Board is still seeking proposals for contributions to the IAMSE Manuals book series to be published in 2024.

The IAMSE Manuals series was established to disseminate current developments and best evidence-based practices in healthcare education, offering those who teach in healthcare the most current information to succeed in their educational roles. The Manuals offer practical “how-to-guides” on a variety of topics relevant to teaching and learning in the healthcare profession. They are compact volumes of 50 to 175 pages that address any number of practical challenges or opportunities facing medical educators. The manuals are published by Springer; online versions are offered to IAMSE members at a reduced price.

We welcome proposal submissions on topics relevant to IAMSE’s mission and encourage multi-institutional, international, and interprofessional contributions. 

The submission deadline has been extended to October 15, 2022.

Each proposal will be evaluated by the IAMSE Manuals Editorial Board using the criteria listed in the full call. The Editorial Board will then discuss the proposals and select 2-to-3 for publication. Selections will be based on how well the proposals match the criteria. We expect publication decisions to be made by December 2022. We anticipate that the selected manuals will publish during the second half of 2024.

Read here for the full call and submission guidelines. 

If you have any questions about submission or the Manuals series please reach out to support@iamse.org.

We look forward to your submissions.

IAMSE Fall 2022 Session 1 Highlights

[The following notes were generated by Michele Haight, PhD.]

The Spring 2022 IAMSE Webinar Seminar Series, titled “To Infinity and Beyond: Expanding the Scope of Basic Sciences in Meeting Accreditation Standards” finished with its fifth seminar on Thursday, March 31, 2022, t

Presenter: Calvin Chou, MD, PhD, FACH, Professor of Medicine, University of California San Francisco

“This Trainee is Terrible:” How to Help the Struggling Learner

Remediation is facilitating a correction for trainees who started out on the journey toward becoming an excellent health professional but have moved off course.

Remediation is not kicking the “can” down the road; it’s kicking the “can’t” down the road.

Definitions and Framing

For learners, there are four different zones of performance with different rules, roles, responsibilities, and thresholds for movement between zones.

Zone 1: Performance above-expected level
no corrective action

Zone 2: Performance below expected level
corrective action

Zone 3: Performance below acceptable level
remediation

Zone 4: Performance below unacceptable level
exclusion

The learners’ trajectory in each of these zones is not wholly linear. However, for learners in Zone 4, their progression and performance over time can be a steep downward slope.

Failing learners is a multi-tiered decision that involves many participants. Failing to fail learners is an ongoing issue across the health professions that impacts health professions’ social duty and responsibility.

Steps of Remediation

There are five steps to remediation:

  1. Identification
  2. Set clear expectations.
  3. Decrease cognitive load.
  4. Create fair assessments.
  5. Engage in early identification.
  6. Clarification
  7. Identify learner-specific contributors to suboptimal performance. Can be assessed through discussion with the learner and requires trust and rapport to be built.
  8. Identify systems-level contributors to suboptimal performance. Can be assessed through discussion with the learner and requires trust and rapport to be built.
  9. Identify competency area deficiencies requiring remediation. Can be assessed by acquiring multi-source feedback on the learner’s performance.

         Remember, an identified concern/contributor is merely the tip of the iceberg.

  1. Collaborating on a learning plan
  2. Foster a feedback culture toward expertise development.
  3. Involve students throughout the process.
  4. Emphasize metacognitive skills.
  5. Develop faculty to highlight best teaching practices.
  6. Align explicit/tacit curriculum with valid, reliable assessments.
  7. Provide ongoing formative feedback.

Define “SMART” goals and meaningful assessment methods at the beginning.

Document the remediation plan and determine who gets a copy and how progress will be assessed.

  1. Intervention
  2. Include activities that promote reflection, self-regulation, and a growth mindset.
  3. Provide consistent coaching and feedback.
  4. Avoid information overload.
  5. Provide ongoing formative feedback.

Systems Intervention

  1. Programmatic Assessment
  2. Identify measurements of academic success.
  3. Create a timeline.
  4. Weigh the possible effects on the learner as an individual and as a member of a learning cohort.
  5. Appraise systems-level contributors to the suboptimal performance (e.g., implicit bias, stereotyping, toxic learning environment, patient load, etc.).
  6. Provide ongoing formative feedback.

Recommendations:

  1. Do not do this alone! Develop the following educator groups for support:
  2. Frontline faculty.
  3. Expert remediation coaches.
  4. Ultimate arbiters who can make defensible, ethical judgments based on a portfolio of imperfect, mixed source data.

Remediation is getting someone back on track by helping our learners and doing our societal duty.

Say hello to our featured member Lindsey Claus!

Lindsey Claus
IAMSE 2022 Outstanding Student Oral Presentation Award Winner
Medical Student at the Boston University School of Medicine

Our association is a robust and diverse set of educators, students, researchers, medical professionals, volunteers and academics that come from all walks of life and from around the globe. Each month we choose a member to highlight their academic and professional career and see how they are making the best of their membership in IAMSE. This month’s Featured Member is Lindsey Claus.

Lindsey Claus
IAMSE 2022 Outstanding Student Oral Presentation Award Winner
Medical Student at the Boston University School of Medicine

Congratulations on winning the Outstanding Student Oral Award, a Student Travel Grant, and a Student Educational Scholarship Grant at the 2022 IAMSE Conference! What influenced your decision to submit to this conference?
I was motivated to submit to the IAMSE Conference because I knew that my mentor Dr. Jonathan Wisco has found IAMSE to be a supportive community of scholars, and I was excited by the opportunity to learn more about medical education initiatives at other institutions through attending sessions at the conference. At the Denver meeting in June 2022, I was blown away by the passion for medical education expressed by many of the other attendees, and I loved chance to attend workshops to dive more deeply into new topics, like the use of competency-based standards in preclinical medical education. I am very much looking forward to attending next year’s conference in CancĂșn!

Tell me a little bit about the research of your winning oral presentation. What really excites you about this topic?
This project was focused on studying the Fall 2021 preclinical ultrasound elective at Boston University School of Medicine to measure the efficacy of the elective in teaching students ultrasound-related concepts and to examine how (or if) the course affected students’ professional identity formation and/or helped students connect their basic science coursework with the principles of future clinical practice. I am very excited by the opportunity that this research provides to meet student-identified interests in gaining clinical skills early in their medical education while trying to determine the most effective and transformational ways to build new learning experiences that meet this need.

Can you tell us more about the project you submitted for your Student Educational Scholarship Grant? 
Through the Student Educational Scholarship Grant project, we are building on our prior study of the 2021 ultrasound elective to see if we can build new learning experiences for students that are particularly focused on applying the principles of self-directed learning. To do this, we are creating opportunities for pairs of students to sign up for additional practice ultrasound sessions, in which they will use a portable Butterfly probe to practice specific ultrasound techniques which they have identified as areas to work on. Our aims are to both measure the efficacy of the Butterfly probe as compared to a traditional ultrasound tower and to examine how students self-define topics to work on and work in pairs to improve at these skills.

As a student member of IAMSE, what benefits does the association offer that help you as a student?   
I feel that I have benefitted tremendously from the opportunities that IAMSE provides for students to meet and learn from experts in the field of medical education, as well as fellow students from other universities. At the 2022 IAMSE Conference in Denver, it was great to be able to meet graduate students and medical students from around the globe who are all passionate about medical education.  

Anything else that you would like to add?
I would like to thank my PI, Dr. Jonathan Wisco, for all of his support, and I would like to emphasize that the Boston University Ultrasound is for Everyone elective was only possible because of the efforts of a large team including my co-leaders, Jessica Landau-Taylor, Brett Cassidy, and Minali Prasad, and many BU faculty members, including especially Dr. Kitt Shaffer. I would also like to thank IAMSE for the organization’s generous support of this research.


Want to learn more about the benefits of being a student member of IAMSE?