Cognitive psychology has
provided many insights into how people learn
that can inform our teaching strategies. In
this presentation I reviewed findings from
the psychology of learning in five domains:
Memory (learning and remembering):
Cognitive psychology tells us that a
critical element of human learning is the
extent to which the learner can impose
meaning on the new material, by integrating
it with what s/he already knows. In contrast
to computer learning (and old models of
human learning like S-R conditioning) a
major determinant of efficiency and
effectiveness of learning is meaning.
Transfer (using old concepts to solve new
problems), Despite our intuitions that once
someone has learned a concept, s/he will be
easily able to access it to solve new
problems, psychologist shave shown that
spontaneous solution rates are typically
only about 10-30%, even when the relevant
concept is known. However there are now a
number of effective strategies to facilitate
transfer. Use of multiple examples is a
common element to all; two examples are ore
effective in learning for transfer than
first learning the underlying concept and
then e\seeing an example. Second, the
learner must actively engage in searching
for the "deep structure' of the
example, and again, the best way to achieve
this is to see the same problem arise in
multiple contexts and to actively engage in
comparison and contrast to seek out the
common elements
Deliberate practice and its critical role
in transfer: Multiple examples are critical
for transfer. There are also strategies to
sequence example optimize their impact. Two
strategies are: a) mixed practice, where the
examples from different categories are
deliberately mixed up, and the learner must
sort them out, and distributed practice,
where practice sessions are spread out over
time.
Experiential knowledge as a component of
expertise While the concepts of formal
knowledge of signs and symptoms, disease
mechanisms, etc. are an important part of
initial clinical learning, experience leads
to the gradual acquisition of multiple
examples, and expert clinicians often use
similarity to prior learned examples as a
first strategy in reasoning, a process
called non-analytic reasoning. Expert
clinicians do diagnosis in many ways just as
people may recognize an everyday object -
it's a chair or a cardiomyopathy because it
look like a chair or a patient with
cardiomyopathy.
General strategic skills
(problem-solving, critical thinking,
reflection, etc.). While we used to think
that expertise resulted from the acquisition
of general skills (problem-solving,
reasoning, etc.), a recurrent finding is
that successful solution of one problem is
almost uncorrelated with solution of
another. This finding, and the futile quest
for general processes that are acquired with
expertise, has led to the abandonment of
search for general skills. With one caveat;
terms like "reflective practice"
and "metacognition" appear to be a
new generation of general skills. However to
date, these "skills" are
underspecified, and it is not yet clear
whether they can be measured, can be
learned, and can be shown to be an important
component of expertise.
Further reading:
Regehr G, Norman GR. Issues in cognitive
psychology: Implications for professional
education. Academic Medicine, 1996; 71:
988-1001.
Eva KW, Neville AJ, Norman GR. Exploring
the etiology of content specificity: Factors
influencing analogical transfer and problem
solving. Academic Medicine, 1998; 73: S1-S6.