|
1
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
- Copyright issues for educators - general
- Copyrights in the digital age
- Fair Use
- Digital Millennium Act
- TEACH Act
- Copyright case study
- Copyright - ownership issues
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
- The court can award up to $100,000 for each separate act of willful
infringement.
- Willful infringement means that you knew you were infringing and you did
it anyway.
- Ignorance of the law is no excuse. If you don't know that you are
infringing, you still will be liable for damages - only the amount of
the award will be affected.
- Then there are attorneys' fees.....
|
|
8
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
10
|
- The purpose of the use, including a nonprofit educational purpose;
- The nature of the work;
- The amount of the work copied;
- The effect of the copying on the potential market for, or the value of,
the original work.
|
|
11
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
15
|
- Fair Use guidelines for educational multimedia
- Proposals for fair use guidelines for digital images and some aspects of
distance learning
- Statement of scenarios dealing with library use of computer software
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
- The DMA of 1998 was the foundation of an effort by Congress to implement
US treaty obligations and to move the nations copyright law into the
digital age.
|
|
18
|
- New Rules Prohibit Circumvention of Technological Protection Measures
- Prohibits alteration of information imbedded in digital works by
copyright owners
- Online Service Provider Limitation on Liability
- Section 108 Update: updating of library and archival preservation rules
|
|
19
|
- Distance Education: The Copyright Office is commissioned to study the
issues associated with distance education utilizing digital networks and
report back to Congress.
|
|
20
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
22
|
- Objective: strike a balance between protecting copyrighted works, while
permitting educators to use those materials in distance education.
- If educators remain within the boundaries of the law, they may use
certain copyrighted works without permission from, or payment of
royalties to, the copyright owner - and without copyright infringement.
|
|
23
|
- The new law offers many improvements over the previous version of
Section 110(2), but in order to enjoy its advantages, colleges,
universities, and other qualified educational institutions will need to
meet the law’s rigorous requirements.
|
|
24
|
- Accredited nonprofit institution
- Institutional copyright policy in place
- Provide copyright information to “faculty, students, and relevant staff
members.”
- Notice to students re copyright
- Access by enrolled students only
|
|
25
|
|
|
26
|
- Expanded range of allowed works
- Permits display of nearly all types of works
- Expansion of receiving locations
- Distance education/Web based/asynchronous
- Storage of content
- Short term retention (duration of course)
- Digitalization of analog works
- Only if digital version is not available
|
|
27
|
- Cannot use materials specifically developed (by someone else) for
distance education without permission.
- Statute mandates instructor’s participation in the planning and conduct
of the distance instruction
- Material is an “integral part of class session.”
- Material “directly related to content of teaching session”
|
|
28
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
35
|
- Teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use)
- Research
- Scholarship
- Nonprofit Educational Institution
- Criticism
- Comment
- Transformative use (changes work for new utility)
- Restricted access
- Parody
- Commercial activity
- Profiting from the use
- Entertainment
- Bad-faith behavior
- Denying credit to original author
|
|
36
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
39
|
- Published work
- Factual or nonfiction based Scholarship
- Important to favored educational objectives
- Unpublished work
- Highly creative work (art, music, novels, films, plays)
- Fiction
|
|
40
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
42
|
- Small quantity
- Portion used is not central
- Amount is appropriate for favored educational purpose
- Large portion or whole work used
- Portion used is central to work or significant to entire work or
"heart of the work"
|
|
43
|
|
|
44
|
- User owns lawfully acquired or purchased copy of original work
- One or few copies made
- No significant effect on the market or potential market for copyrighted
work
- No similar product marketed by the copyright holder
- Lack of licensing mechanism
- Could replace sale of copyrighted work
- Significantly impairs market or potential market for copyrighted work or
derivative
- Reasonably available licensing mechanism for use of the copyrighted work
- Affordable permission available for using work
- Numerous copies made
- You made it accessible on Web or in other public forum
- Repeated or long term use
|
|
45
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
47
|
- Purpose - OK
- Nonprofit, teaching, scholarship
- Nature – OK
- Published work, factual article
- Amount – OK
- One article, germane to class
- Effect – OK?
- No impact on sale of magazine
- Online single article fee?
|
|
48
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
54
|
- Who owns what you create?????
|
|
55
|
- Copyright protection begins the moment an original work is fixed in a
tangible medium of expression.
- The author is the de facto copyright holder unless other issues come
into play.
|
|
56
|
- Each University has it’s own guidelines for “ownership”.
- The American Association of University Professors also has a policy
regarding ownership of academic works.
|
|
57
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
61
|
- The best recommendation is to clarify issues in writing before you
create materials that you wish to copyright protect.
- Many Universities have contract templates that you can fill out prior to
starting a project to obtain a ruling on copyright ownership.
|
|
62
|
|
|
63
|
- New statues provide some benefits but they also have some added
restrictions.
- Fair Use is very ambiguous
- But ambiguous can be good!!!
- Common sense and logic will probably hold you in good stead!
|
|
64
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
69
|
|