|
|
|
|

Webcast Audio Seminar Series
| |
Defining and Implementing
Competency
in Basic Science Education
Regina
Kreisle, M.D., Ph.D.
Associate Professor of Pathobiology
Purdue University and
Lafayette Center for Medical Education
Lafayette, IN U.S.A.
|
Description
Beginning in the Fall of 1998, the Indiana
University School of Medicine launched a new
curriculum that incorporated the evaluation and
assessment of general medical competencies
throughout all four years of the medical school
curriculum. Modeled after the curriculum
at Brown University, students must demonstrate
proficiency in nine areas, or competencies,
prior to graduation. These areas include
communication, clinical skills, basic science
knowledge, lifelong learning, problem solving,
ethics, social and community context of
medicine, self-awareness and self-care, and
professionalism. The importance of these
competencies to the well-trained physician was
underscored by new requirements of the
Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical
Education for outcomes assessment of
competencies in graduate medical training.
It is generally anticipated that similar
requirements will eventually be incorporated
into the accreditation review of undergraduate
medical education programs. While it is
clear how these competencies might apply to the
clinical practice of medicine, many basic
science educators have serious questions on
their applicability to the basic science
components of the curriculum. Is the
evaluation of competencies such as
professionalism and ethical thinking desirable
or even possible in basic science courses?
In this one-hour IAMSE Audio Seminar, Dr.
Kreisle will share the experience of the last
fours years as the faculty has struggled with
the issue of incorporating general medical
competencies into the basic medical sciences at
Indiana University. Definitions of general
medical competencies, their applicability to
undergraduate medical education, and issues of
competency evaluation will be discussed.
She will offer both practical suggestions and
challenging perspectives as she relates the
successes and failures of the competency-based
curriculum at Indiana University School of
Medicine.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |