| DISCIPLINE-BASED ROUND TABLE DISCUSSION: |
Pharmacology |
| |
|
| SESSION LEADER(S): |
Gary C. Rosenfeld, Ph.D., University of Texas Houston Medical School,
Houston, TX, U.S.A. |
| |
|
| OTHER PRESENTERS: |
|
| |
|
| HANDOUTS or SLIDES |
|
The group of 10 discussants devoted most of its time identifying the
major issues confronting the discipline of pharmacology. Although
many topics were discussed, in the end consensus was reached regarding
four major issues.
Training and development of the next generation of medical pharmacology
educators
At many schools the senior pharmacologists teach medical pharmacology.
Most modern day departments have recruited junior faculty with no formal
training in pharmacology and with little or no experience relating to the
medical aspects of the discipline. As senior faculty retire there
is concern about who will assume responsibility for teaching and whether
or not important clinical elements of the discipline will continue to be
emphasized.
Merging or elimination of pharmacology departments
A number of traditional pharmacology departments have been merged with
other basic science departments or, in some instances, eliminated.
The impact on medical pharmacology teaching and learning was thought by
the discussion group to be uncertain but important to determine.
Impact of centralized, integrated, organ-based curriculum on the
control of pharmacology content by pharmacology faculty
Many schools have established an integrated organ-based strategy for
medical education in which much of pharmacology is distributed piecemeal
throughout the curriculum. The result is that pharmacology is often
not recognized as a distinct discipline or is given less than adequate
time by students. Comparisons between curricular types vis a vis
pharmacology was thought by the discussion group to be worth further investigation.
Re-exposure of medical students to the basic science of pharmacology
during their clinical training
Re-exposure of medical students to the basic principles of pharmacology,
and to important details of drug action and their adverse effects, was
thought by the discussion group to be a worthwhile goal in the clinical
training of medical students. Precisely how to ensure such exposure
without promoting a formal didactic course was uncertain but worth investigating
further.
There was general agreement by the discussion group that future IAMSE
sessions should be devoted to one or more of these topics and that the
sessions could be enhanced if they were interdisciplinary and included
both basic science and clinical science educators.
© Copyright
1997-02 IAMSE
|